Obama veers into Carterland
Sunday, September 7th, 2008So Obama clearly had his work cut out for him appearing on Bill O’Reilly’s show. But O’Reilly couldn’t be happier with this first part of the interview. What a #$# disaster for Obama. The clip’s at the end of this (and at this link): but on question after question Obama comes off as a waffler. If he goes into the debates like this, he’s going to get taken apart. Play by play:
First, at the beginning; Obama suddenly smiles, and it looks fake as hell. This is undoubtedly Fox News’ little touch (it’s a travesty they call themselves unbiased and fair); he didn’t know when the camera started running, but it’s not a great start.
Second, he’s asked if he thinks Iran is a threat, and he launches into a discussion of Sunni vs. Shiite. Does he think Middle America cares? He should have just said, absolutely, it’s a threat and left it at that.
Third, when he’s asked if he would use military force against Iran if necessary, he says he wouldn’t take the option off the table. A yes answer would have been a little more impressive.
Fourth, when he’s asked would he even PREPARE for the military force option against Iran he starts waffling about all those other great options: embargos, sanctions, etc., etc., while O’Reilly jumps all over him. Aargh.
Fifth: the surge. This is giving Obama all sorts of trouble, especially because he’s already said the surge has worked “beyond our wildest dreams.” So naturally when O’Reilly says, “c’mon, admit it, you were right on the decision to go to war, and wrong on the surge, c’mon, just say it,” Obama comes off as stubborn. There’s a far easier way out of this: look, Bill, the surge may be working so far, but it hasn’t worked yet….and unless we follow it up with rebuilding and aid to Iraq it’s not going to work….and if we do all that, I’ll be happy to come on your show and say it works but until then how about you shut the fuck up with all your posturing, huh, Bill?
Sixth: when they get to Pakistan, O’Reilly taunts him with “well, you wouldn’t send in the ground troops”, and Obama doesn’t disagree. We’ve already HAD ground troops (well, special forces) in Pakistan; why assume anything at this point?
Anyway. Point being we’ve seen all this before: Democratic candidates/presidents coming off as being way too reluctant to use military force. It spells electoral disaster. And it also makes for weak presidents.