<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David J. Williams &#187; nukes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/tag/nukes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog</link>
	<description>Autumn Rain 2110</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 07:38:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>More thoughts on Iran&#8217;s sat</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/</link>
		<comments>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran's satellite launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iran&#8217;s satellite launch has got folks concerned about whether they&#8217;re about to perfect ballistic missile technology as well. This is something that&#8217;s good to be concerned about, but it&#8217;s worth remembering that if you can get something into orbit you&#8217;ve already got a global missile. It may not be as sexy as an ICBM capable [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran&#8217;s satellite launch has got folks concerned about whether they&#8217;re about to perfect <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/library/news/2009/space-090203-afps01.htm" target="_blank">ballistic missile technology</a> as well. This is something that&#8217;s good to be concerned about, but it&#8217;s worth remembering that if you can get something into orbit you&#8217;ve already <em>got</em> a global missile. It may not be as sexy as an ICBM capable of hitting any street you like in New York City from the moment it&#8217;s launched, but as long as you can de-orbit your payload with precision you won&#8217;t be worried about sexiness.</p>
<p>Nikita Khrushchev certainly wasn&#8217;t.  Right about when he was ranting on about how &#8220;we-is-gonna-bury-you&#8221; was when he was signing off on development of the Fractional Orbital Bombardment System:  strap a massive warhead to a satellite, and then de-orbit it over the U.S. city of your choice.  Technically, <a href="http://www.astronautix.com/craft/ogch.htm" target="_blank">FOBS</a> (as it&#8217;s affectionately known) wasn&#8217;t even in violation of the soon-to-be-signed Outer Space Treaty of 1967, since the orbits were obstensibly partial ones.</p>
<p>But before everybody starts to panic, let&#8217;s get back to Iran.  To attain a FOBS capability, they&#8217;d need three things.</p>
<p><em>1. Increased payload</em>.  The Safir-2 payload isn&#8217;t enough for anything but the most tactical of nukes.</p>
<p><em>2. Precision de-orbiting capability</em>.  Getting something into space is tough, but it&#8217;s a helluva lot easier than re-entry/landing.</p>
<p><em>3. A nuclear warhead</em>.  Always top of any self-respecting nation&#8217;s shopping list.  And it turns out that today is the day that <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KB05Ak01.html" target="_blank">discussions resume</a> in Frankfurt about just what the West should/could be doing to prevent Iran from getting one.  Hmmm.  If I were a fly, I know where <em>I&#8217;d</em> like to be. . .</p>
<p>And I should note that you don&#8217;t even need #2 if you want to have some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse" target="_blank">fun with EMP effects</a>.  But more on that later.</p>
<p><em>For an in-depth look at the weaponization of space a hundred years from now, my novel </em><em>Mirrored Heavens is available at your local bookstore and at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse" target="_blank">Amazon</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nukes:  the third generation</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/12/22/nukes-the-third-generation/</link>
		<comments>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/12/22/nukes-the-third-generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beam weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xasers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you realize just how little info there is out there on third generation nukes? It&#8217;s a crying shame. Federation of American Scientists even highlights information on fourth generation nukes without saying anything about the third generation. Which is a travesty, as third generation hardware is easily the coolest. Essentially it constitutes a mechanism to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you realize just how little info there is out there on third generation nukes? It&#8217;s a crying shame. Federation of American Scientists even highlights information on <a href="http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/News/INESAPTR1.html" target="_blank">fourth generation nukes</a> without saying anything about the third generation. Which is a travesty, as third generation hardware is easily the coolest. Essentially it constitutes a mechanism to deploy a warhead like a beam weapon: you detonate the <a href="http://www.autumnrain2110.com/index.php?action=military#xaser" target="_blank">device</a> and channel the x-rays at the target and whammo. Besides my, er, private collection (of articles, not weapons) the best I can find out there is an <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,964414,00.html" target="_blank">old piece</a> in TIME from more than twenty years ago, which isn&#8217;t that surprising, given that these weapons were intended to be the crown jewel in the SDI system.  There are times I miss the &#8217;80s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/12/22/nukes-the-third-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>tick tick tick tick tick tick tick</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/12/09/tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tick/</link>
		<comments>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/12/09/tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wmd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amidst all the uproar over my cat last week, I&#8217;m only just now getting to the long-awaited report by Congress on weapons of mass destruction. The key soundbite: &#8220;unless the world community acts decisively and with great urgency, it is more likely than not that a weapon of mass destruction will be used in a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amidst all the uproar over my <a href="http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/12/04/last-chance/#comment-828" target="_blank">cat</a> last week, I&#8217;m only just now getting to the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/04/terrorism-nuclear-attack-congress-report" target="_blank">long-awaited report</a> by Congress on weapons of mass destruction. The key soundbite: &#8220;unless the world community acts decisively and with great urgency, it is more likely than not that a weapon of mass destruction will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013.&#8221; The report goes on to say that the most likely source of any nuclear device would be Pakistan, given that they&#8217;ve been <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Deception-Pakistan-United-Nuclear-Weapons/dp/1843545330/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1228840677&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">peddling their nukes</a> in every Central Asian bazaar they can find. If this sounds depressing to you, just imagine how I feel about it:  I live in Washington D.C. (why, I&#8217;m not so sure).  My cat remains blissfully unaware of all this, though he would probably welcome any scenario in which mice start to glow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/12/09/tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
