<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morgan vs. Tolkien</title>
	<atom:link href="http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/24/morgan-vs-tolkien/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/24/morgan-vs-tolkien/</link>
	<description>Autumn Rain 2110</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jW</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/24/morgan-vs-tolkien/comment-page-1/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=999#comment-1212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Tolkien is certainly not above criticism, Morgan ignores the fact that aesthetics (like everything else) change and evolve over time.  Modern works like &quot;Wicked&quot; owe their success to deconstructing the pillar that was &quot;The Wizard of Oz&quot;.

In equal fashion, Tolkien set the foundation for us in black &amp; white (over 50 frackin years ago), so decades later we can appreciate Morgan&#039;s shades of gray.  I would argue that the process cannot succeed in reverse...children need to understand &quot;good&quot; and &quot;bad&quot; before they can handle &quot;it depends on how you look at it&quot;.

So agree with Morgan&#039;s point if we ignore the 50+ years difference between the two works, and also think the LOTR fanboys need to harden up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Tolkien is certainly not above criticism, Morgan ignores the fact that aesthetics (like everything else) change and evolve over time.  Modern works like &#8220;Wicked&#8221; owe their success to deconstructing the pillar that was &#8220;The Wizard of Oz&#8221;.</p>
<p>In equal fashion, Tolkien set the foundation for us in black &amp; white (over 50 frackin years ago), so decades later we can appreciate Morgan&#8217;s shades of gray.  I would argue that the process cannot succeed in reverse&#8230;children need to understand &#8220;good&#8221; and &#8220;bad&#8221; before they can handle &#8220;it depends on how you look at it&#8221;.</p>
<p>So agree with Morgan&#8217;s point if we ignore the 50+ years difference between the two works, and also think the LOTR fanboys need to harden up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Collins</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/24/morgan-vs-tolkien/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=999#comment-1209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I absolutely love it when Richard stirs shit up.  

I tried to read the LOTR books when the movies were coming out since I enjoyed the film versions so much.  I absolutely struggled with the third book.  I did finish it but I didn&#039;t enjoy it anywhere near as much as the films.

I totally get where Richard is coming from.  His Steel Remains has his trademark noir sensibility applied to a fantasy setting which is written for adults.  It&#039;s not just the violence or the sex, it&#039;s the grayness surrounding everyone.

I&#039;m not normally a fantasy fan in general but I loved this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love it when Richard stirs shit up.  </p>
<p>I tried to read the LOTR books when the movies were coming out since I enjoyed the film versions so much.  I absolutely struggled with the third book.  I did finish it but I didn&#8217;t enjoy it anywhere near as much as the films.</p>
<p>I totally get where Richard is coming from.  His Steel Remains has his trademark noir sensibility applied to a fantasy setting which is written for adults.  It&#8217;s not just the violence or the sex, it&#8217;s the grayness surrounding everyone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not normally a fantasy fan in general but I loved this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/24/morgan-vs-tolkien/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=999#comment-1206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man those books by Richard looks like good shit to grab a drink and read. I will be getting these. Thanks for the tip. What&#039;s up with Mr. Kitty? Is he proofing your 3rd book?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man those books by Richard looks like good shit to grab a drink and read. I will be getting these. Thanks for the tip. What&#8217;s up with Mr. Kitty? Is he proofing your 3rd book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
