<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More thoughts on Iran&#8217;s sat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/</link>
	<description>Autumn Rain 2110</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Williams</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=929#comment-1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it deserves an entirely separate post.  : )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it deserves an entirely separate post.  : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polter</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=929#comment-1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what do you think of this &#039;ban&#039; announcement DW?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what do you think of this &#8216;ban&#8217; announcement DW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Williams</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/comment-page-1/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=929#comment-1138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can neither confirm nor deny it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can neither confirm nor deny it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=929#comment-1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, is it true that this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hulu.com/superbowl/55642/super-bowl-xliii-ads-bridgestone-hot-item&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Super Bowl commercial&lt;/a&gt; was clipped from your upcoming novel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Burning-Skies-David-J-Williams/dp/0553385429/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1233767733&amp;sr=8-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Burning Skies?&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, is it true that this <a href="http://www.hulu.com/superbowl/55642/super-bowl-xliii-ads-bridgestone-hot-item" rel="nofollow">Super Bowl commercial</a> was clipped from your upcoming novel <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Burning-Skies-David-J-Williams/dp/0553385429/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1233767733&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">The Burning Skies?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polter</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2009/02/04/more-thoughts-on-irans-sat/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/?p=929#comment-1133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama seeks space weapons ban...

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama&#039;s pledge to seek a worldwide ban on weapons in space marks a dramatic shift in U.S. policy while posing the tricky issue of defining whether a satellite can be a weapon.

Moments after Obama&#039;s inauguration last week, the White House website was updated to include policy statements on a range of issues, including a pledge to restore U.S. leadership on space issues and seek a worldwide ban on weapons that interfere with military and commercial satellites.

It also promised to look at threats to U.S. satellites, contingency plans to keep information flowing from them, and what steps are needed to protect spacecraft against attack.

The issue is being closely watched by Lockheed Martin Corp, Boeing Co, Northrop Grumman Corp, the biggest U.S. defense contractors, and other companies involved in military and civilian space contracts.

Watchdog groups and even some defense officials welcomed the statement, which echoed Obama&#039;s campaign promises, but said it would take time to hammer out a comprehensive new strategy.

Enacting a global ban on space weapons could prove even harder...

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE50O15X20090125]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama seeks space weapons ban&#8230;</p>
<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) &#8211; President Barack Obama&#8217;s pledge to seek a worldwide ban on weapons in space marks a dramatic shift in U.S. policy while posing the tricky issue of defining whether a satellite can be a weapon.</p>
<p>Moments after Obama&#8217;s inauguration last week, the White House website was updated to include policy statements on a range of issues, including a pledge to restore U.S. leadership on space issues and seek a worldwide ban on weapons that interfere with military and commercial satellites.</p>
<p>It also promised to look at threats to U.S. satellites, contingency plans to keep information flowing from them, and what steps are needed to protect spacecraft against attack.</p>
<p>The issue is being closely watched by Lockheed Martin Corp, Boeing Co, Northrop Grumman Corp, the biggest U.S. defense contractors, and other companies involved in military and civilian space contracts.</p>
<p>Watchdog groups and even some defense officials welcomed the statement, which echoed Obama&#8217;s campaign promises, but said it would take time to hammer out a comprehensive new strategy.</p>
<p>Enacting a global ban on space weapons could prove even harder&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE50O15X20090125" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE50O15X20090125</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
