<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Space-Centric Warfare, Part Five:  Underwater Combat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/</link>
	<description>Autumn Rain 2110</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Osborn</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Osborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/#comment-394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t see a good other place to put this, but at last Wednesday&#039;s Orange County Science Fiction club, I pointed out that there are replacements for satellites, both for surveillance and for communications, such as tethered balloons or dirigibles.

One tech that I have yet to see explored:  We know that the police have these marvelous high-power video-telescopes in their copters.  Given all the motion and vibration, they have to have some amazing image stabilization.

With much lower quality stabilization, it should be possible to aim a modulated laser, such as a $200 200mW green laser pointer, at a fixed surface, such as a billboard or convenient building wall.  Someone else could &quot;tune in&quot; to the laser by simply aiming a telescope at that point.  If you had a feedback loop to keep the reflection centered, then you could have very high bandwidth communications, and, if you used UV or IR, it might be very hard to detect, much less decrypt.

In fact, if you had something conveniently high in the sky, such as a mirror-surface tethered dirigible, say, as a backup to the satellites being knocked out, then the entire bandwidth of the L.A. area could be handled that way.  No fiber, no copper, just fairly low-powered modulated lasers sending signals point-to-point.  (Of course, weather could be a problem...  Weather?  WEATHER?  We don&#039;t need no STINKIN WEATHER!  (Eat your heart out - non Californios.))

Might be useful to your upcoming sequel&#039;s terrorists...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see a good other place to put this, but at last Wednesday&#8217;s Orange County Science Fiction club, I pointed out that there are replacements for satellites, both for surveillance and for communications, such as tethered balloons or dirigibles.</p>
<p>One tech that I have yet to see explored:  We know that the police have these marvelous high-power video-telescopes in their copters.  Given all the motion and vibration, they have to have some amazing image stabilization.</p>
<p>With much lower quality stabilization, it should be possible to aim a modulated laser, such as a $200 200mW green laser pointer, at a fixed surface, such as a billboard or convenient building wall.  Someone else could &#8220;tune in&#8221; to the laser by simply aiming a telescope at that point.  If you had a feedback loop to keep the reflection centered, then you could have very high bandwidth communications, and, if you used UV or IR, it might be very hard to detect, much less decrypt.</p>
<p>In fact, if you had something conveniently high in the sky, such as a mirror-surface tethered dirigible, say, as a backup to the satellites being knocked out, then the entire bandwidth of the L.A. area could be handled that way.  No fiber, no copper, just fairly low-powered modulated lasers sending signals point-to-point.  (Of course, weather could be a problem&#8230;  Weather?  WEATHER?  We don&#8217;t need no STINKIN WEATHER!  (Eat your heart out &#8211; non Californios.))</p>
<p>Might be useful to your upcoming sequel&#8217;s terrorists&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Williams</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/#comment-312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re entirely right--they wouldn&#039;t.  Thanks for the catch--I&#039;ve cleared up the wording now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re entirely right&#8211;they wouldn&#8217;t.  Thanks for the catch&#8211;I&#8217;ve cleared up the wording now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joni</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/#comment-310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am wondering how supercavitating submarines would be stealthy. I mean wouldn&#039;t they be terribly noicy and if they travel in a super-heated bubble wouldn&#039;t that be quite easy to find?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering how supercavitating submarines would be stealthy. I mean wouldn&#8217;t they be terribly noicy and if they travel in a super-heated bubble wouldn&#8217;t that be quite easy to find?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Williams</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/#comment-308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad you&#039;re liking it so far, JD.  Stay tuned for more . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you&#8217;re liking it so far, JD.  Stay tuned for more . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/07/04/space-centric-warfare-part-five-underwater-combat/#comment-306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s depressing to realize i&#039;m stupider than i thought and do need a bigger dictionary,too. great stuff,you. i got one thing though-ba nang kee, that&#039;s how i call him, is a chickenshit alright. i don&#039;t even understand why not the gov but a private corp is in charge of money. ok, that&#039;s enough,good stuff, Dave.
ps. also i do think they should make a movie out of your book, not Bay, my choice would be, Terry Gilliam or Scott brothers - a movie will save my brain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s depressing to realize i&#8217;m stupider than i thought and do need a bigger dictionary,too. great stuff,you. i got one thing though-ba nang kee, that&#8217;s how i call him, is a chickenshit alright. i don&#8217;t even understand why not the gov but a private corp is in charge of money. ok, that&#8217;s enough,good stuff, Dave.<br />
ps. also i do think they should make a movie out of your book, not Bay, my choice would be, Terry Gilliam or Scott brothers &#8211; a movie will save my brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
