<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homeworld and the nature of this one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/</link>
	<description>Autumn Rain 2110</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Williams</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/#comment-244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome, thank you sir. . .! 

I think from a writing perspective, the biggest challenge with world-building is knowing when to stop--i.e., how deep down the rabbit-hole do you need to go?  It&#039;s a tricky balance to strike.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, thank you sir. . .! </p>
<p>I think from a writing perspective, the biggest challenge with world-building is knowing when to stop&#8211;i.e., how deep down the rabbit-hole do you need to go?  It&#8217;s a tricky balance to strike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/#comment-227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The manual for the first Homeworld was probably one of the most brilliantly conceived pieces of sci fi I read at the time.  I think I spent more time reading it then I did playing the game--which was equally great, mind you.  I&#039;m very eager to read your novel--my local Borders let me down, but its on its way.  If I ever take a crack at writing, the sort of world building you did in Homeworld would undoubtedly be a significant influence.  And based on your site I see that you&#039;ve put in the same effort building a very plausible, if depressing, future world.  

I&#039;ve added your blog to my google reader and I&#039;m looking forward to more!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The manual for the first Homeworld was probably one of the most brilliantly conceived pieces of sci fi I read at the time.  I think I spent more time reading it then I did playing the game&#8211;which was equally great, mind you.  I&#8217;m very eager to read your novel&#8211;my local Borders let me down, but its on its way.  If I ever take a crack at writing, the sort of world building you did in Homeworld would undoubtedly be a significant influence.  And based on your site I see that you&#8217;ve put in the same effort building a very plausible, if depressing, future world.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve added your blog to my google reader and I&#8217;m looking forward to more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Williams</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/#comment-199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a great point.  I hadn&#039;t thought of it that way, but I think you&#039;re right.  I think the only way to read modern Creationism, really, is as a Luddite movement:  bombarded by future shock, and unable to #$# deal, they&#039;ve lapsed into an elaborate fantasy world.  

And glad you&#039;ve got the book!  Keep me posted . . .  let me see, the middle of Immersion ..  hmm, I think the shooting is JUST about to start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a great point.  I hadn&#8217;t thought of it that way, but I think you&#8217;re right.  I think the only way to read modern Creationism, really, is as a Luddite movement:  bombarded by future shock, and unable to #$# deal, they&#8217;ve lapsed into an elaborate fantasy world.  </p>
<p>And glad you&#8217;ve got the book!  Keep me posted . . .  let me see, the middle of Immersion ..  hmm, I think the shooting is JUST about to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wired</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wired]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/#comment-198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What especially weird about the Creationist movement is that it pretty much contradicts the whole development of theological and rational thinking *of the Church itself* between the High Middle Ages and now. Thomas Aquinus and the scholars following him were fundamental in formulating the thesis that by using the humans&#039; reason one could deduct the &quot;Laws of God&quot; (meaning the way the world works, thus laying the foundation for empiricism). It&#039;s kinda sad that a guy from the 14th century was intellectually more developed that the Creationists are...

Btw, got your book yesterday, I&#039;m in the middle of &quot;Immersion&quot; right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What especially weird about the Creationist movement is that it pretty much contradicts the whole development of theological and rational thinking *of the Church itself* between the High Middle Ages and now. Thomas Aquinus and the scholars following him were fundamental in formulating the thesis that by using the humans&#8217; reason one could deduct the &#8220;Laws of God&#8221; (meaning the way the world works, thus laying the foundation for empiricism). It&#8217;s kinda sad that a guy from the 14th century was intellectually more developed that the Creationists are&#8230;</p>
<p>Btw, got your book yesterday, I&#8217;m in the middle of &#8220;Immersion&#8221; right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Williams</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/#comment-193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you got that right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you got that right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert</title>
		<link>http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/12/homeworld-and-the-nature-of-this-one/#comment-190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yah Überjumper is awesome like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah Überjumper is awesome like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
