Comments on: The next generation of warfare http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/ Autumn Rain 2110 Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: When Sci-Fi Writers Quibble | DanBailey.net http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/#comment-148 When Sci-Fi Writers Quibble | DanBailey.net Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:09:27 +0000 http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/#comment-148 [...] we’ve moved on to Fourth Generation Warfare (4GW). The author of the book, David Williams, responded to that question (poorly worded as it was) in his blog. And now I feel the need to respond [...] [...] we’ve moved on to Fourth Generation Warfare (4GW). The author of the book, David Williams, responded to that question (poorly worded as it was) in his blog. And now I feel the need to respond [...]

]]> By: David Williams http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/#comment-145 David Williams Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:52:56 +0000 http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/#comment-145 Yes, that's it. Thanks for calling my attention to the oversight. I've added the link on the blog post as well. Yes, that’s it. Thanks for calling my attention to the oversight. I’ve added the link on the blog post as well.

]]> By: PurpleSlog http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/#comment-144 PurpleSlog Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:04:44 +0000 http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/#comment-144 I think this is the post: http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809 I think this is the post:

http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=809

]]> By: PurpleSlog http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/#comment-143 PurpleSlog Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:01:04 +0000 http://autumnrain2110.com/blog/2008/06/01/the-next-generation-of-warfare/#comment-143 Please post a link to the discussion mentioned in your post. Thanks! Please post a link to the discussion mentioned in your post. Thanks!

]]>